Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:09:51 +0100
- From: Michal Čihař <nijel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version
Hi On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:41:34 -0600 Raphael Geissert <atomo64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Michal Čihař <nijel@xxxxxxxxxx> > gammu The problem with this is that there are stable versions, for which I use watch file and are uploaded to unstable. Testing versions I put (usually) to experimental and I don't change watch file there. Is it really that big problem that packages in experimental don't have absolutely correct watch file? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version
- From: Raphael Geissert
- Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version
- Prev by Date: Re: How to express bullet lists
- Next by Date: Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's
- Previous by thread: Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version
- Next by thread: Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version
- Index(es):