Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 02:09:07 +0200
- From: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
Hi, > > The foo package's build dependencies are only relevant when building the > > foo package. For someone who develops software based on libbar, it is > > not obvious that foo's build dependencies are required. > Except that a -dev package can be perfectly functional without > pkg-config. So, in that case it should not be a dependency, but a > recommends. With a recommends, foo will still need to declare a build dependency. Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- From: Stephen Gran
- Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- References:
- Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- From: Fabian Greffrath
- Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- From: Simon Richter
- Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez
- Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- Prev by Date: Bug#474321: Fwd: patch for gpart to support Windows XP NTFS
- Next by Date: Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- Previous by thread: Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- Next by thread: Re: Should -dev packages providing .pc files depend on pkg-config?
- Index(es):