Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 19:18:39 +0200
- From: David Paleino <d.paleino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
Hi all, I'm trying to cut down john's bugs [0], and I've encountered #132223 [1]. As the previous maintainer did, I would have marked that bug as wontfix, because a normal user shouldn't normally run programs not in $PATH. However, re-reading the Policy, it states: +==> §12.1 | Each program, utility, and function should have an associated manual page | included in the same package. It is suggested that all configuration files | also have a manual page included as well. Manual pages for protocols and other | auxiliary things are optional. +========== This suggests that it should have a manpage. But, it's a *should*. On the other hand, I know that many "entities" which are not in $PATH have their own manpage -- see for example Perl modules. How should I behave here? Kindly, David [0] http://bugs.debian.org/john [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=132223 -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- From: brian m. carlson
- Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- From: Mikhail Gusarov
- Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Prev by Date: Processed: block 480521 with 450483
- Next by Date: Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Previous by thread: Processed: block 480521 with 450483
- Next by thread: Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Index(es):