Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 19:41:26 +0200
- From: David Paleino <d.paleino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
On Sun, 11 May 2008 00:36:00 +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Twas brillig at 19:18:39 10.05.2008 UTC+02 when David Paleino did gyre and > gimble: > > DP> How should I behave here? > > I'd treat john-any and john-mmx as parts of program - merely > implementation details. That's what I thought. Thus, john.8 should suffice for both. I'll wait for any other response before acting on the bug. Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- From: Goswin von Brederlow
- Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- References:
- Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- From: David Paleino
- Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- From: Mikhail Gusarov
- Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Prev by Date: Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Next by Date: Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Previous by thread: Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Next by thread: Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH
- Index(es):