clive: volatile or not-for-stable?
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 16:07:23 +0700
- From: Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: clive: volatile or not-for-stable?
Hello, Package I maintain (clive) relies in functioning on external resources (YouTube, GoogleVideo and less known ones) which change frequently. This means clive need to be regularely updated to continue to function. I suppose clive should not be included in stable release due to such unsatisfactory state of things, but what should I do instead? I've read debian-volatile procedures and it seems quite restrictive - upload only by maintainer, and I'm not a DD (yet) and unclear. Is it ok just to file RC bug "Should not enter testing" and forget about the problem with clive in stable releases forever? --
Attachment:
pgpdPVpKwojUQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: clive: volatile or not-for-stable?
- From: Luk Claes
- Re: clive: volatile or not-for-stable?
- Prev by Date: Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails
- Next by Date: Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?
- Previous by thread: Bug#480583: ITP: libheckle-ruby -- Heckle is a mutation tester.
- Next by thread: Re: clive: volatile or not-for-stable?
- Index(es):