Re: ssl problems: gpg affected?

[Karl Goetz <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 08:09 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Do, 15 Mai 2008, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > No. Any key who had a single DSA signature created by the flawed version of
> > OpenSSL should be considered compromised. DSA requires a secret, random
> 
> Does this extend to gpg keys and its signatures? That would make quite
> an impact.

The DSA said no.
kk

> 
> Best wishes
> 

> 
-- 
Karl Goetz <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part