Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 16:24:42 -0700
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:39:36PM +0100, peter green wrote:
>> 2) Introduce a default-mta package (currently) depending on exim4. All
>> packages requiring a MTA should depend on default-mta |
>> mail-transport-agent. This will have the extra advantage that we (and
>> others like CDDs and derived distros) easily could swap default MTA.
> What concerns me about this approach is that it could easilly end up with
> dist-upgrades swapping out users mail systems without warning. I would
> consider such behaviour unacceptable as it could easilly cause mail loss
Er, no, that wouldn't happen. As long as packages correctly depend on
default-mta | mail-transport-agent, this will have no impact on upgrades.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@xxxxxxxxxx vorlon@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx