Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 02:10:39 +0200
- From: Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <eugen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
15 травня 2008 о 16:24 -0700 Steve Langasek написав(-ла): > > What concerns me about this approach is that it could easilly end up with > > dist-upgrades swapping out users mail systems without warning. I would > > consider such behaviour unacceptable as it could easilly cause mail loss > > Er, no, that wouldn't happen. As long as packages correctly depend on > default-mta | mail-transport-agent, this will have no impact on upgrades. > This can happen if user has 'default-mta' package installed, and it changes (if it is done like with 'gcc' package now).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- From: Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- From: Roland Mas
- Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- From: Steve Langasek
- Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- References:
- re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- From: peter green
- Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- From: Steve Langasek
- re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Prev by Date: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Next by Date: Re: Bug#427697: Is sbackup maintained? If not, what to do?
- Previous by thread: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Next by thread: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Index(es):