Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:11:05 +0200
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 04:45:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > 2) Introduce a default-mta package (currently) depending on exim4. All
> > packages requiring a MTA should depend on default-mta | mail-transport-agent.
> > This will have the extra advantage that we (and others like CDDs and derived
> > distros) easily could swap default MTA.
>
> I believe that 2) is the correct option, and can see no reason that it
> shouldn't be implemented straight away.
AOL
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- From: Sune Vuorela
- Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- From: Steve Langasek
- Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Prev by Date: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Next by Date: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Previous by thread: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Next by thread: Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
- Index(es):