Re: bashism question
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:33:21 -0400
- From: James Vega <jamessan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: bashism question
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:28:36PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > It's safe for use with dash, but using it is technically a violation of > > Policy (albeit a widespread one). There is a Policy bug open requesting > > that the XSI extensions for trap and kill be permitted (#477240). > > >From this I'd say for Lenny using trap with a signal number is fine. > > Also they same question comes up with the "local" keyword. Dash seems to > support this, while it is not POSIX. The "local" keyword is an explicitly supported extension. These are discussed in Section 10.4 of policy. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bashism question
- From: Michael Meskes
- Re: bashism question
- References:
- bashism question
- From: Michael Meskes
- Re: bashism question
- From: Adam D. Barratt
- Re: bashism question
- From: Michael Meskes
- bashism question
- Prev by Date: Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository
- Next by Date: Re: Arch-dependent Depends
- Previous by thread: Re: bashism question
- Next by thread: Re: bashism question
- Index(es):