Re: bashism question
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:38:54 +0100
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: bashism question
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 17:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Supporting "local x" would be relatively simple; suggestions for a > > reliable regex to catch use of -a/-o welcome... :) > > There was a fairly good one in Lintian that I took out once Policy blessed > it, or at least we didn't get a lot of false positive reports. Thanks; that looks like it stands a good chance of being resilient. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- bashism question
- From: Michael Meskes
- Re: bashism question
- From: Adam D. Barratt
- Re: bashism question
- From: Michael Meskes
- Re: bashism question
- From: James Vega
- Re: bashism question
- From: Michael Meskes
- Re: bashism question
- From: Adam D. Barratt
- Re: bashism question
- From: Russ Allbery
- bashism question
- Prev by Date: Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository
- Next by Date: Re: bashism question
- Previous by thread: Re: bashism question
- Next by thread: Re: bashism question
- Index(es):