Re: FHS and /var/www
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:40:21 +0100
- From: Stephen Gran <sgran@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: FHS and /var/www
This one time, at band camp, Joey Hess said: > The idea that you shoot off a list saying "eh, Debian would like to violate the > FHS now" and get back a "oh, fine we put in a footnote, so you're still FHS > compliant" does not match anything I've observed re the FHS. That was sort of the point of the footnote :) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@xxxxxxxxxx | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Stephen Gran
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Carl Fürstenberg
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Stephen Gran
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Steve Langasek
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Stephen Gran
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Steve Langasek
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Stephen Gran
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Steve Langasek
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Stephen Gran
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- From: Joey Hess
- Re: FHS and /var/www
- Prev by Date: Re: "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?"
- Next by Date: Re: Intel Atom Processor
- Previous by thread: Re: FHS and /var/www
- Next by thread: Re: FHS and /var/www
- Index(es):