Re: CUPS vs lpd (was Re: Giving up on Iceweasel 3.0)

["s. keeling" <keeling@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>:
>  On 07/06/08 02:49, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> >
> > 4. because, in the light of the above, using it will involve me in a
> > fair amount of work for no clear benefit and possibly a worse output.
> 
>  Huh????????  *Using* CUPS is as difficult as rolling off a log.

BS!  CUPS is one of the most unpredictable and fragile systems I've
seen.  Why bother when five lines of printcap can replace it, and
imagemagick (for one) does that for you?!?


-- 
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)    http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html      Linux Counter #80292
- -    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html    Please, don't Cc: me.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx