Re: [PATCH] Documentation: mention how to define multiple strategies
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 02:18:02 +0200
- From: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: mention how to define multiple strategies
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 04:44:01PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It indeed is supported to give multiple strategies and let "git merge" try > each of them. > > However, I have a very strong doubt if it is really worth keeping the > support, let alone advertising it. > > Really. It was a fun experiment while it was being invented, but I never > saw any practical usefulness with it. As a general rule, I try to change nothing while working on builtin-merge. Should I drop support for it (making an exception here), or will you accept tests for this, just you would like to exclude it from documentation? Thanks.
Attachment:
pgp2l5TxrJhsc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH] Documentation: mention how to define multiple strategies
- From: Miklos Vajna
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: mention how to define multiple strategies
- From: Junio C Hamano
- [PATCH] Documentation: mention how to define multiple strategies
- Prev by Date: Re: Re* [PATCH] Make git add -u honor --dry-run
- Next by Date: [PATCH] Replace in-place sed in t7502-commit
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: mention how to define multiple strategies
- Next by thread: [PATCH] git-fast-import: rename cmd_*() functions to parse_*()
- Index(es):