Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:22:55 +0100
- From: "Mike Ralphson" <mike.ralphson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
2008/5/15 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>: > I'd prefer heterogeneous automated test coverage to be on 'next' and > 'master'. If the coverage extends to 'maint' that would be nicer... > Do you have any interest in seeing the results of these automated builds? I'm thinking specifically of the case where you're about to tag a final release... Obviously I'll shout on the list if/when we get a breakage. An example of a tracking fork with the build/pass tags pushed to it is at http://repo.or.cz/w/git/gitbuild.git - unfortunately as the branches are significant, the mob approach doesn't really work, so if anyone else would like to push tags to this repo, please just ask. Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- References:
- [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Brian Gernhardt
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Johannes Schindelin
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Brian Gernhardt
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Jeff King
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Mike Ralphson
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Jeff King
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Mike Ralphson
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Mike Ralphson
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Jeff King
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From: Junio C Hamano
- [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mailsplit and mailinfo: gracefully handle NUL characters
- Next by Date: Re: Why do git submodules require manual checkouts and commits?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- Index(es):