Re: [PATCH] mailsplit and mailinfo: gracefully handle NUL characters
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:32:20 +0100 (BST)
- From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailsplit and mailinfo: gracefully handle NUL characters
Hi,
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Avery Pennarun wrote:
> On 5/16/08, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > BTW I do not know how much fgetc() instead of fgets() slows
> > down things, but I expect both to be equally fast because
> > they are both buffered, right?
>
> In my experience, fgetc() is pretty fantastically slow because you
> have a function call for every byte (and, I gather, modern libc does
> thread locking for every fgetc). It's usually much faster to fread()
> into a buffer and then access the buffer.
Hmpf. I hoped to get more definitive information here. Especially given
that fgetc() is nothing more than a glorified fread() into a buffer, and
then access the buffer.
Well, at least you kind of pointed me to the _unlocked() function family.
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html