Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:38:39 +0100 (BST)
- From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
Hi,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > When you look for a fix instead of a regression, it can be quite hard
> > to twist your brain into choosing the correct bisect command between
> > 'git bisect bad' and 'git bisect good'.
> >
> > So introduce the commands 'git bisect fixed' and 'git bisect unfixed'.
>
> It seems to me that your problem is that git-bisect requires the "good"
> revision to be older than the "bad" one. If this requirement were
> removed, would there still be a need for "fixed" vs. "unfixed"?
Nope.
The thing that makes "fixed" and "bad" special is that _one_ commit
introduced that.
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html