Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:53:07 -0400
- From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
Lea Wiemann wrote:
Michael Haggerty wrote:Therefore it should be easy to teach git-bisect to locate either kind of transition, "bad" -> "good" or "good" -> "bad", depending only on where the user places the original "good" and "bad" tags.I think this is a good suggestion (though I haven't thought things through). Another idea is to add "old" and "new" (or something like that) as aliases to "good" and "bad", since that's the only semantics that the bisect labels actually seem to have.
"Before" and "After" the "Change" maybe? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- From: Karl Hasselström
- Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- References:
- [TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- From: Johannes Schindelin
- Re: [TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- From: Jeff King
- Re: [TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- From: Johannes Schindelin
- [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- From: Johannes Schindelin
- Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- From: Michael Haggerty
- Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- From: Lea Wiemann
- [TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- Prev by Date: RE: Windows symlinks
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pre-commit hook should ignore carriage returns at EOL
- Previous by thread: Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- Next by thread: Re: [NON-TOY PATCH] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed'
- Index(es):