Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: Allow missing base objects when creating thin packs
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:12:30 -0400 (EDT)
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: Allow missing base objects when creating thin packs
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Now with a test! :-) > [...] > +# Clone patch_clone indirectly by cloning base and fetching. > +# > +test_expect_success \ > + 'indirectly clone patch_clone' \ > + '(mkdir user_clone && > + cd user_clone && > + git init && > + git pull ../.git && > + test $(git rev-parse HEAD) = $B > + > + git pull ../patch_clone/.git && > + test $(git rev-parse HEAD) = $C > + ) > + ' What if the first test command fails? Won't its result be ignored? Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: Allow missing base objects when creating thin packs
- From: Shawn O. Pearce
- Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: Allow missing base objects when creating thin packs
- References:
- RFC: Allow missing objects during packing
- From: Shawn O. Pearce
- Re: RFC: Allow missing objects during packing
- From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: RFC: Allow missing objects during packing
- From: Shawn O. Pearce
- Re: RFC: Allow missing objects during packing
- From: Shawn O. Pearce
- Re: RFC: Allow missing objects during packing
- From: Nicolas Pitre
- [PATCH] pack-objects: Allow missing base objects when creating thin packs
- From: Shawn O. Pearce
- RFC: Allow missing objects during packing
- Prev by Date: Re: TopGit: problem with patch series generation
- Next by Date: [TopGit PATCH/RFC] Do not use mktemp
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pack-objects: Allow missing base objects when creating thin packs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: Allow missing base objects when creating thin packs
- Index(es):