Re: GInterfaces and API Stability

[Alp Toker <alp@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Well, I have certainly considered C ABI compatibility to be the main deciding
> factor when  making such decisions. I'd say if C# interfaces are inflexible like
> that then mapping GObject interfaces directly to C# interfaces was probably
> wrong.

This is totally missing the point. GObject interfaces exist to formalise 
a pattern of design by contract. Even if the C compiler doesn't catch 
and report incomplete interface implementations, that doesn't make it 
correct to ship code that breaks the rules.

Your argument is analogous to claiming that it's OK to change property 
and signal names and parameters in an ABI-stable release because the C 
compiler won't notice that anything has broken.
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list