Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 20:30:09 +0200
- From: Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:51:18 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 19:44 +0200, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: > > > > I don't want to start a flame war over old hat, but statements like this > > > shouldn't go unchallenged. GLib/GTK+ chose a different technology as a > > > base than Qt did (C vs. C++, and no pre-processing source versus > > > preprocessing source). > > > > Different, and inferior. > > thank you for your interesting and well-detailed take on the design of > GLib and GObject. Maybe you should also filter out arbitrary words from quotes, it would certainly allow for even more brilliant jokes. -- Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
pgpa7Pxwkw22Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Paul Davis
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- References:
- Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Kristian Rietveld
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Jean-Yves Lefort
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Jean-Yves Lefort
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Paul Davis
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Jean-Yves Lefort
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Emmanuele Bassi
- Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Next by Date: Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Next by thread: Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Index(es):