Qt vs. Gtk+ holy war Was: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0

["Alberto Ruiz" <aruiz@xxxxxxxxx>]

2008/6/5 Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@xxxxxxx>:

On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 08:59 +0200, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote:
[...]

> Likewise, you can implement a class "Foo" containing an int property
> "bar" using the GObject way:
>
>       #define G_TYPE_FOO              (g_foo_get_type())
>       #define G_FOO(obj)              (G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST((obj), G_TYPE_FOO, GFoo))
>       #define G_FOO_CLASS(class)      (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_CAST((class), G_TYPE_FOO, GFooClass))
>       #define G_IS_FOO(obj)           (G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANE_TYPE((obj), G_TYPE_FOO))
>       #define G_IS_FOO_CLASS(class)   (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_TYPE((class), G_TYPE_FOO))
>       #define G_FOO_GET_CLASS(obj)    (G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_CLASS((obj), G_TYPE_FOO, GFooClass))

[...]

>
> or using the Qt way:
>
>       class QFoo : public QObject
>       {
>          Q_OBJECT
>
>          Q_PROPERTY(int bar READ bar WRITE setBar)

[...]

>
> Which way do you prefer?

The Vala way ?

Good point btw.
 

Okay, Qt vs. Gtk+ is a very interesting topic indeed, may I ask people interested in it to change the subject so we stop adding noise to the thread? pretty please?

-- 
Cheers,
Alberto Ruiz
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list