Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:43:27 +0100
- From: Paul LeoNerd Evans <leonerd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:44:08 +0300 "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > P.S. Me, and many developers hate C++ with passion, if a toolkit > requires C++, it's cutting a huge user-base. See also earlier discussions regarding C89 vs. C99 style, specifically with regard to availability of compilers across a wide variety of platforms. How does C++ compare with C99 here? -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
- References:
- Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Kristian Rietveld
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Jean-Yves Lefort
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Jean-Yves Lefort
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Paul Davis
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Jean-Yves Lefort
- Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- From: Felipe Contreras
- Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Qt vs. Gtk+ holy war Was: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Next by Date: Re: Is this a bug of GMainLoop?
- Previous by thread: Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Next by thread: Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0
- Index(es):