Re: unable to build kdepimlibs

[Allen Winter <winter@xxxxxxx>]

On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:58:29 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Allen Winter wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 January 2008 17:34:21 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >> On 10.01.08 16:09:16, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> >>> Hmm... I seem to have boost-1.32.0. Is that insufficient? If so,
> >>> pimlibs is missing a cmake check...
> >>
> >> I know I'm on the "bleeding edge", but I think 1.32.0 is quite old. And
> >> no there's no version check missing in pimlibs. Its missing in cmake's
> >> own FindBoost.cmake which is AFAIK used in kdepimlibs.
> >
> > Yes, FindBoost is coming from cmake itself.
> > Which only supports boost-1._33_0 through boost-v1_34_1
> >
> > It would be nice if FindBoost would tell you that your version is too
> > old, but you'd need to put a bug report in to the cmake folks.
>
> Ok, I can do that. Hmm, nice of them to not have a 'required version' in
> that (or do they expect apps requiring a specific version to write their
> own??).
>
> Which, I suppose, is an interesting point... how would people feel about
> me forking FindBoost.cmake into kdepimlibs to work around KitWare's
> defective version?

Not crazy about that idea.
Can you upgrade your boost?



 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<