Re: fsync() madness
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:27:54 +0000
- From: letto <letto2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: fsync() madness
On Sunday 20 April 2008 14:41:19 Sami Liedes wrote:
> Well, I read those threads and everyone there seems to think it's no
> major performance hit.
What are you talking about? I've read those threads and it seems that this
behaviour was only necesarry for xfs and that it was planned to make it
detect fs at run-time and only fsync when necesarry. See this message
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-devel&m=119453925805510&w=2
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<