Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:39:55 -0300
- From: Thiago Macieira <thiago@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
Bart Van Assche wrote: >On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Thiago Macieira <thiago@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Bart Van Assche wrote: >> >Below you can find another sample program. When compiled and linked >> >against Qt3, it triggers data races. When compiled and linked >> > against Qt4, the program does not trigger any data races. Is the >> > program OK or not ? >> >> The program is still wrong. You did not read what I said: you MUST >> use QDeepCopy in Qt 3. >> >> And that class does not exist in Qt 4. > >I read and understood your statement about QDeepCopy. The second >example I provided does not explicitly share any QString objects over >threads. What was misleading in my example is that &S1 was passed as >the fourth argument of pthread_create(), while thread_func() does not >use this pointer. The fourth argument of pthread_create() should have >been NULL. Ok, I see your point. Then it seems QString is not reentrant in Qt 3 as the documentation says. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- References:
- KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- From: Thiago Macieira
- Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- From: Bart Van Assche
- KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Prev by Date: Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Next by Date: Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Previous by thread: Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Next by thread: Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Index(es):