Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:55:38 -0300
- From: Thiago Macieira <thiago@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
Bart Van Assche wrote: >On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Thiago Macieira <thiago@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Then it seems QString is not reentrant in Qt 3 as the documentation >> says. > >Should I file a bug report for this ? No. It's pointless since Qt 3 has reached end-of-life. You can come up with the patch on your own and add to the Qt 3 qt-copy, in the KDE servers. And hope that distributions remember to rebuild and apply the patch in their next releases. Also note that switching from a simple increment to an atomic one is a performance penalty that could be considerable for Qt 3 / KDE 3 applications. As for locking, it is defintely a bad, bad idea. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- References:
- KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- From: Thiago Macieira
- Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- From: Bart Van Assche
- KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Prev by Date: Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Next by Date: Re: fsync() madness
- Previous by thread: Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Next by thread: Re: KDE, Qt3 and Amarok
- Index(es):