Re: Private classes and Q_Objects

["Nathan Bradshaw" <nathanlbradshaw@xxxxxxxxx>]

cool, thanks very much for the answer Thiago. 

So the private class is just cleaned up by deleting d_ptr in the public class' destructor as per usual practice?

cheers
Nathan

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Thiago Macieira <thiago@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Nathan Bradshaw wrote:
>Hi all, I have a situation where I have a library with a private class /
>s_ptr arrangement. I need to create an instance of a Q_OBJECT derived
> class in the private class. What is the best method of parenting the
> Q_OBJECT in the private class?
>
>Should I derive the private class from Q_OBJECT and make it the parent?
>Should I use Q_DECLARE_PUBLIC / Q_Q() to get the private class' parent
>(itself a Q_OBJECT derived class) and use that as the parent?

The private class(es) should derive from QObject, have the Q_OBJECT macro,
but they should have no parent.

You'll control the lifetime of that class directly.

--
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358


>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<