Re: Remove last reminants of dyntick support
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:31:29 +0100
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Remove last reminants of dyntick support
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:17:19AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:56:00PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Neither S390 nor SH have the configuration option for NO_IDLE_HZ
> > in their Kconfig files, yet their defconfig files lists them.
> > Remove those references.
> >...
>
> I'm not a fan of touching defconfig files this way - this easily leads
> to patch conflicts without any real advantage.
That only becomes a problem if the defconfigs are regularly touched.
If we do find that there's conflicts, I'll drop them.
Actually, I'll move them into separate commits now, so if a conflict
occurs it's just a case of removing the offending commit.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/