Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 12:48:04 +0200
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
> I thought that KVM people want to do it per device (in the first > case). So with my patchse, they can replace the dma_ops pointer in > dev_archdata with what they want. But where would they save the original pointer? -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- From: FUJITA Tomonori
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- From: FUJITA Tomonori
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- From: FUJITA Tomonori
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- Prev by Date: Re: [i2c] Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer
- Next by Date: Final Notification
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: per-device dma_mapping_ops
- Index(es):