Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 20:32:44 +0200
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:09:36PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: ...Do things improve if you set txqueuelen to a larger value *before* configuring the qdiscs?BTW, I hope it was *before*, but since pfifo_fast_enqueue() uses "qdisc->dev->tx_queue_len" does it really matter? (Until it's before the test of course...)
Yes, CBQ uses pfifo, not pfifo_fast. pfifo uses txqueuelen to inialize q->limit, but thats whats used during ->enqueue(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- From: Jarek Poplawski
- Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- References:
- Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- From: Jarek Poplawski
- Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- From: Kingsley Foreman
- Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- From: Patrick McHardy
- Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- From: Jarek Poplawski
- Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
- Next by Date: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: core-balancer v2
- Previous by thread: Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- Next by thread: Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface
- Index(es):