Re: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:21:48 +0900
- From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
> Tracepoint > - stored in a section > - dynamic activation > - no message > - export kernel structure > - arguments depending on points > - high frequently called > - no module support (kernel use only) Why Shouldn't kernel module use tracepoint? technical problem? or any plicy exist? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
- From: Masami Hiramatsu
- Re: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
- References:
- RE: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
- From: Takashi Nishiie
- Re: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
- From: Masami Hiramatsu
- RE: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/8] CGroup Files: Convert devcgroup_access_write() into a cgroup write_string() handler
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Tracepoint proposal
- Index(es):