Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:32:57 +0100
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
> The bug, as I see it, in the alim15x3 (ULi M5228) hardware: for some > reason it does not hold IRQ line, but rises it for some short period > of time (while the drive itself rises and holds it correctly -- I'm > seeing it via oscilloscope). Are you sure the kernel isn't touching the status register and so clearing the IRQ condition at the controller ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- From: Anton Vorontsov
- Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- References:
- [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- From: Anton Vorontsov
- Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- From: Anton Vorontsov
- Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- From: Anton Vorontsov
- [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] x86 boot: only pick up additional EFI memmap if add_efi_memmap flag
- Next by Date: Re: [10 PATCHES] inline functions to avoid stack overflow
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with preempt-able hardirqs
- Index(es):