Re: [PATCH 0/22] Introducing asm/syscalls.h

[Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Matthew,

On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 00:16 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> sys_fork() does seem to be the worst case scenario.  I suspect there's
> similar ones (clone?).  I still think it's worth adding them all to
> linux/syscalls.h.
> 

I tried my best to make things simpler. I also tried this in :- 
[PATCH 17/22] sh: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
[PATCH 21/22] x86: Introducing asm/syscalls.h

For same architecture it looks complex for 32 and 64 bit.

You can Imagine how linux/syscalls.h will look if we add all
architectures in it.

And you can imagine what will be size of linux/syscalls.h. As more than
60% of arch dependent syscalls have totally different prototypes.

Thank you,

Jaswinder Singh.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/