Re: [PATCH 4/22] avr32: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:09:11 +0200
- From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/22] avr32: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > +asmlinkage int sys_fork(struct pt_regs); This should be "struct pt_regs *" > +asmlinkage int sys_clone(unsigned long, unsigned long, > + unsigned long, unsigned long, > + struct pt_regs *); > +asmlinkage int sys_vfork(struct pt_regs); Same thing here. Other than that, looks good to me. Haavard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 4/22] avr32: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- From: Jaswinder Singh
- Re: [PATCH 4/22] avr32: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- References:
- [PATCH 0/22] Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- From: Jaswinder Singh
- [PATCH 1/22] Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- From: Jaswinder Singh
- [PATCH 2/22] alpha: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- From: Jaswinder Singh
- [PATCH 3/22] arm: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- From: Jaswinder Singh
- [PATCH 4/22] avr32: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- From: Jaswinder Singh
- [PATCH 0/22] Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- Prev by Date: Re: [regression] nf_iterate(), BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
- Next by Date: Re: [regression] nf_iterate(), BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 9/22] ia64: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/22] avr32: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
- Index(es):