Re: [PATCH 00/16] dyn_array and nr_irqs support v2

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>]

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> The interesting implication of this is that if you have the right hardware
> and are absolutely loopy you can have more interrupt sources than can
> be described in a 32bit unsigned int, and certainly more than any sane person
> would allocate in a statically sized array.

Yes, I'm quite convinced that the statically sized array is a bad idea.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/