Re: [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:41:26 +0200
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
* Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I haven't had a chance to review the code thoroughly yet, but I had > been working on a similar fix and know that this is sorely needed. > So... btw., why exactly does this patch speed up certain workloads? I'm not quite sure about the exact reasons of that. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
- From: Gregory Haskins
- Re: [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
- References:
- [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
- From: Gregory Haskins
- [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
- Next by Date: Re: [Bug 11388] New: 2.6.27-rc3 warns about MTRR range; only 3 of 16gb of memory is usable
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER load balancing
- Index(es):