Re: [Mingw-users] MinGW gcc 3.x, 4.x and exceptions

[Charles Wilson <cwilso11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John E. / TDM wrote:
  Additionally, I do not have enough assurance of
> being in compliance with the libgcc and libstdc++ licenses if I were to 
> distribute these DLLs commercially.

Pure FUD.

> I recognize that the benefits of shared libgcc and libstdc++ might 
> outweigh the downsides for other people, however, so my preference would 
> be, if at all possible, to make both methods available and give 
> MinGW/GCC users a choice.

Great.  *FOUR* different versions of the compiler. Eight if you count 
cygwin variants.

--
Chuck

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
MinGW-users mailing list
MinGW-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users