Re: Who's this Supoch Seanganant?

["Moz Champion (Dan)" <moz.champion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
> »Q« wrote:
>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
>> <peter.potamus.the.purple.hippo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I think he's posting in HTML, and when its sent to the list, the list 
>>> strips the html and thats why we don't see anything.
>>
>> Even the html parts that come in e-mail have no new text, just quotes.
> 
> incase you forgot, please re-read this posting.  Its the last paragraph 
> that applies to you, especially the last 8 words of that posting:
> news://news.mozilla.org:119/W7-dneH6VcdUZojVnZ2dnUVZ_sGvnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.general/msg/203f5eb3630e3258
> 
> Thank you for your consideration into this matter.
> 


Excuse me Peter, or Craig, or whatever your name is.

There is a distinct problem with this repeated statement of yours, in 
which you request/ask someone not to reply to you, because you consider 
them a member of a group.

However, when someone else requests/asks YOU not to post in a specific 
group, you ignore them. Please explain how you expect people to follow 
YOUR instructions when you ignore the instructions of others?

Please explain why you expect anyone to adhere to YOUR specifications 
when you have no authority in these newsgroups, other than a user, when 
you yourself fail to adhere to the specifications of a person who was 
duly appointed as authority in a specific newsgroup?

You are demanding an apology for someone's actions, when they were FULLY 
accreditted and empowered to take those actions (regardless if deserved 
or not). Will you, Sir, apologize to others if they object to your 
actions? Such actions taken by you without any accreditation or empowerment.

In short, sir, your very actions and words negate the reasoning that 
others should respect your wishes. If you cannot follow the dictates of 
a ruling from the duly appointed, accredited and empowered 'monitor' 
without argument, then how in the world can you expect anyone else to 
follow your ruling, unappointed, non-accredited and non empowered as you 
are?

Once again, regardless if the 'ruling' was arbritrary or not, was 
personal or not, was deserved or not, it WAS a ruling by the powers that 
be AND it was supportted by the highest authority in these newsgroups.
Yet, you expect others to adhere to YOUR ruling, arbritary or not, 
personal or not, deserved or not, without any power (other than that of 
a user).

By carrying on this ridiculous charade, you are simply digging your own 
hole deeper.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general