Re: Service Pack 3 for XP is Toxic, Need help with Seamonkey

["Terry R." <Terry.F1ComNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx>]

The date and time was 5/9/2008 3:31 PM, and on a whim, »Q« pounded out 
on the keyboard:

> "Terry R." <Terry.F1ComNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> The date and time was 5/9/2008 2:59 PM, and on a whim, »Q« pounded
>> out on the keyboard:
>>
>>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 20:14:25 -0600
>>> Lon Stowell <lon.stowell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>>>> Terry Kepner wrote:  
>>>>>> I just recovered from Service Pack 3 for XP trashing my Windows 
>>>>>> completely.   
>>>>> I just installed XP-SP3 and i am lucky - windows working normally
>>>>> except for the first time after the firtst reboot.  
>>>> I had all high priority Pro/SP2 upgrades installed, and the update
>>>> to XP3 was one of the most boring upgrades I've seen.
>>>> Seamonkey ran flawlessly and even RealPlayer ran afterwards.
>>>>
>>>> The ISO image version was even fast.
>>> I think MS needs a checklist for handling release media.  From the
>>> SP3 iso:
>>>
>>> -----
>>> /media/opticaldrive $ lynx --dump faq.htm | head -n 7
>>>
>>>         More information about installing Service Pack 2
>>>
>>>    [1]How long will it take to install Service Pack 2?
>>>
>>>    [2]How will the security of my computer be enhanced?
>>>
>>>    [3]Where can I get more information about Service Pack 2?
>>> -----
>>>
>>> [followup set to mozilla.general]
>> What do those items have to do with SP3?
> 
> Nothing other than their presence on the SP3 cd.
> 

Why would "their presence" be needed on an SP3 cd?  Why would ANY info 
about SP2 be needed on an SP3 cd?

-- 
Terry R.
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general