Re: OT: Thunderbirds are go commercial

[JoeS <joesab2005@xxxxxxxxx>]

»Q« wrote:
> "Moz Champion (Dan)"<moz.champion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
>> Terry R. wrote:
>>
>>> While not "banned", a poster was removed even from this thread. Was
>>> it any more OT than any other post?
>>>
>>> follow-up set to mozilla.general
>> Again, I am not the monitor so I cannot say.
>
> Removal of OT posts doesn't depend on a post being "more OT" or "less
> OT" than another post.  As the policy makes clear, once someone has
> gotten to the point where his posts can be removed, any OT post from
> him will be cancelled.
>
> <http://www.mozilla.org/community/cancellation.html>
>
>> I see posts from Herb, Peter (who WAS banned in
>> mozilla.thunderbird.multimedia), Herb, Andreas, myself and  Terry.
>> As this thread is in mozilla.support.thunderbird I don't know if the
>> 'ban' applies here or not (I suspect it doesn't) - I can still see
>> Peter's post here.
>
> Peter's ban from the mozilla.test.multimedia only applies to that
> group, not any others.  There was a post in this thread removed, but
> not his.

I'm wondering if the removal caused the thread to disappear in google groups. (can't find it there)
Or perhaps the OT: prefix in the subject ? I don't see the x-noarchive header, or whatever the correct expression is.

-- 
JoeS

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general