Re: OT: Thunderbirds are go commercial
The date and time was 5/13/2008 4:39 PM, and on a whim, Moz Champion
(Dan) pounded out on the keyboard:
> Terry R. wrote:
>> The date and time was 5/13/2008 3:58 PM, and on a whim, Moz Champion
>> (Dan) pounded out on the keyboard:
>>
>>> Andreas M wrote:
>>>> On 08.05.2008 15:43 Herb wrote
>>>>
>>>>> On 08.05.2008 13:29 UK Time, squaredancer wrote:
>>>>>> careful, Herb!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you DO realise, of course, that posting links to video-sequences
>>>>>> (such as "Wimoweh" etc) will get you BANNED - no questions asked -
>>>>>> from these groups??
>>>>> Hi Reg,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the warning - I'm not sure about banned, although I have
>>>>> seen 'expired' messages from certain individuals ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> Why should such things happen? I liked the link to the clip. It's not
>>>> spam.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This group is monitored, and the monitor can decide which posts (and
>>> content) are 'allowed' within the group. Currently, the acid test
>>> seems to be some sort of 'testing' for the file/multimedia
>>>
>>> It has occurred within the relatively recent past, one person was
>>> 'banned'. You would not see any remenants of it, nor evidence, as the
>>> banning results in a complete removal of said post.
>>>
>>> There was much discussion regarding this matter in this (and other)
>>> newsgroups. The outcome of it was that the 'monitor's' decision was
>>> upheld by the powers that be. I have yet to fathom the distinction
>>> between one post and another with regards to 'testing' myself, but
>>> then I am not the monitor and have no say in the matter.
>> While not "banned", a poster was removed even from this thread. Was it
>> any more OT than any other post?
>>
>> follow-up set to mozilla.general
>>
>
>
> Again, I am not the monitor so I cannot say.
>
> Whose post was removed? The last time someone claimed such it was an
> anomaly within his specific TB, the post was still here, others could
> see it, he could not. He thought his post had been removed, it hadn't been.
>
> So, to prevent another round of 'false' accusations, which post (whose)
> are you claiming was removed?
>
>
> I see posts from Herb, Peter (who WAS banned in
> mozilla.thunderbird.multimedia), Herb, Andreas, myself and Terry. As
> this thread is in mozilla.support.thunderbird I don't know if the 'ban'
> applies here or not (I suspect it doesn't) - I can still see Peter's
> post here.
Reg had a post removed. If you look at PTH, Herb & Andreas, you can see
his post. I have it in my list but the post is gone.
--
Terry R.
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general