Re: OT: Thunderbirds are go commercial
The date and time was 5/13/2008 7:21 PM, and on a whim, »Q« pounded out
on the keyboard:
> In <news:D_ednUX_rZQm27fVnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Terry R." <Terry.F1ComNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The date and time was 5/13/2008 5:41 PM, and on a whim, »Q« pounded
>> out on the keyboard:
>>
>>> "Moz Champion (Dan)" <moz.champion@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Terry R. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> While not "banned", a poster was removed even from this thread.
>>>>> Was it any more OT than any other post?
>>>>>
>>>>> follow-up set to mozilla.general
>>>> Again, I am not the monitor so I cannot say.
>>> Removal of OT posts doesn't depend on a post being "more OT" or
>>> "less OT" than another post. As the policy makes clear, once
>>> someone has gotten to the point where his posts can be removed, any
>>> OT post from him will be cancelled.
>> That's as clear as mud. "gotten to the point" is about as arbitrary
>> as it gets.
>
> How one gets to that point is laid out clearly at the link you snipped,
> <<http://www.mozilla.org/community/cancellation.html>.
>
> If by "arbitrary", you mean "decided by arbiters", I agree with you.
> If you mean its more common sense of "capricious or unreasonable", then
> no.
>
>> So who thought Reg had "gotten to the point"? You? Chris? Nir?
>
> Nir and Chris were making those calls at the time. I joined the team a
> bit later.
>
His post was removed just a couple days ago. You "joined" the team
quite a long time ago.
--
Terry R.
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general