Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns [ solved thankyou :) ]
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:46:53 +0200
- From: Richard <mysql_list@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns [ solved thankyou :) ]
Yes that would be easier, except that I would still have to create a tempory table to add 10 days onto the ones which have a status waiting for answer from customer and have not been answered for more than 10 days.
This system is for customers who do not have an account yet to contact me. And will only be used by me an my team. In normal usage I will not be expecting the table of unanswered messages to be any longer than 10 or 20 lines,
So I will leave it be for the moment as it works exactly as I want it to and as it will be on a server with alot of free ressources.
Thanks for all your suggestions ! :) Andy Wallace a écrit :
Not sure, but perhaps an even simpler method would be to consider the initial insert an update as well... so the update column would always have a value. Then the sort would (I believe) always be in the order you want, and if you need to differentiate between rows that are new vs rows that are updated, (date = update) => new. You can put an index on this field and not have the performance issue to worry about. Just a thought. andy Richard wrote:Thanks,This is for the unanswered list of questions, so the output list (not the list stored in the mysql database) should never go over 100.by scalable, do you mean alot of ressources being used or a long wait for the answer? Because I belive I Could just use a simple limit if I needed to have a limited number of results on one page.Every time a question is answered the update date will change, and the status could also change. So I don't see how to easily do this by creating another table.Ben Clewett a écrit :Richard,No problem, glad it works. But note: this is not scalable. If you have more than a few hundred rows, you may want to think about a better solution, like storing the order field permanetly and giving it an index :)Ben Richard wrote:Thanks, it works like a charm :) Ben Clewett a écrit :A modification to my last email, try: SELECT *, IF(update != '', update + 10, date) AS o FROM my_table ORDER BY o DESC; +-----+------+--------+------+ | num | date | update | o | +-----+------+--------+------+ | 5 | 40 | 90 | 100 | | 2 | 10 | 60 | 70 | | 6 | 50 | | 50 | | 4 | 30 | | 30 | | 3 | 20 | | 20 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | +-----+------+--------+------+ Richard wrote:Thanks,I think that your solution will be sufficient for my needs, however I would still like to know for my personal knowledge how to manage correctly this kind of need.And to make it more complicated I've just rearlised that there is another element to take into account, I would need to add 10 days to the update dates so they would place themselves in the correct position.This is how I need the system to work : Any new requests (without an update value) are ordered by dateI want to be able to answer these requests (adding a time stamp to the update field and if the customer does not answer within 10 days, to re insert them into the list.But as the update timestamp will be 10 days old, I would like to add 10 days to the update while inserting them to the list (not changing the actual value inserted in the database just add 10 days during the reordering process.). I hope my explanation in understadable ...:) Rafael Barbolo Lopes a écrit :Can't you do Something like: ORDER BY (update,date) The major column of ordering would be update and the second date. I'm not sure about this "solution"On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Richard <mysql_list@xxxxxx <mailto:mysql_list@xxxxxx>> wrote:Hello I've tried the following with mysql 4.1.11SELECT * FROM quick_contact WHERE (`status` = '0') OR (`status` = '2' AND `update` < '".(time()-864000)."') CASE WHEN `update` = ''THEN ORDER BY `date` DESC ELSE ORDER BY `update` DESC END CASE;It does not work but, is it my code that is wrong or is it just thatcase does not work with mysql 4.1.11 ? Thanks :) Kristian Myllymäki a écrit : mysql version? http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/case-statement.htmlorder by case when updated is not null then updated else createdend desc; /Kristian On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Richard <mysql_list@xxxxxx <mailto:mysql_list@xxxxxx>> wrote: Hello, I've got a table which containes two date colomns. The first one is called `date` and the second `update` In the first one I put the ticket creation date, and on update I add or change the update value. So the update colomn does not contain a value until the first update has been done. I would like to order the tickets by their last update value. And if this value does not exist use the date value. at the moment I use this : ORDER BY `date` DESC" and I would like to replace it by something like this : ORDER (IF `update`!= '' BY UPDATE ELSE BY DATE)I know this code is completly wrong, just to try and showyou what I need ... Here is an example of what I want to achieve num | date | update ------------------------------------------- 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 60 3 | 20 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 40 | 90 6 | 50 | The required result would be : num | date | update ------------------------------------------- 5 | 40 | 90 2 | 10 | 60 6 | 50 | 4 | 30 | 3 | 20 | 1 | 1 | Thanks in advance :) -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysqlTo unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=kristian@xxxxxxxx-- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysqlTo unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=barbolo@xxxxxxxxx-- .:: Rafael Barbolo Lopes ::. http://barbolo.polinvencao.com/
-- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=royale@xxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- Help with ORDER BY using two colomns
- From: Richard
- Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns
- From: Kristian Myllymäki
- Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns
- From: Richard
- Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns
- From: Rafael Barbolo Lopes
- Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns
- From: Richard
- Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns
- From: Ben Clewett
- Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns [ solved thankyou :) ]
- From: Richard
- Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns [ solved thankyou :) ]
- From: Ben Clewett
- Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns [ solved thankyou :) ]
- From: Richard
- Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns [ solved thankyou :) ]
- From: Andy Wallace
- Help with ORDER BY using two colomns
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns [ solved thankyou :) ]
- Next by Date: Database Synchronisation Methods
- Previous by thread: Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns [ solved thankyou :) ]
- Next by thread: Re: Help with ORDER BY using two colomns [ solved thankyou :) ]
- Index(es):