Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Moving to git for v4l-dvb

[Brandon Philips <brandon@xxxxxxxx>]

On 17:46 Thu 14 Feb 2008, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:20:55 -0800
> Brandon Philips <bphilips@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On 10:24 Tue 05 Feb 2008, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Maybe we've took the wrong direction when we've decided to select
> > > mercurial. It were better and easier to use, on that time, but the -git
> > > improvements happened too fast.
> > 
> > We should consider a move to a full-tree git.  Particularly, it would be
> > nice to be have v4l-dvb merging/building against other subsystems in the
> > linux-next tree:
> > 
> >   http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/512
> > 
> > Also, it would save the silly pain of things like this meye.h thing and
> > pulling in fixes from the rest of the community that patches against git
> > trees.
> About linux-next, this is really a good idea. I've already implemented a
> linux-next -git tree for v4l-dvb. This tree is generated at the same time I
> generate the master -git. Since I update this often, I think this will work
> properly.

Great.  It should be interesting to see what happens with linux-next.

Cheers,

	Brandon

--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list