Re: question for soc-camera driver
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:47:08 +0800
- From: "冯鑫" <fengxin215@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: question for soc-camera driver
2008/4/14 Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>: >> I found the problem with reversed frame order. The same problem led to >> corrupted frames. Please try the patch below on the top of the previous >> one. With it I have no more problems with the test application with any >> number of buffers. 2008/4/14 冯鑫 <fengxin215@xxxxxxxxx>: > I test it and It is good.But some frames is dropped,like > 1,2,3,4,5,8,9,10,11,14,15,16,17,18,21,22.The frame 6,7,12,13,19,20 is > dropped.I request 4 buffers now. Will you improve soc-camera driver for the lost frames? Thanks fengxin -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- References:
- question for soc-camera driver
- From: 冯鑫
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: 冯鑫
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: 冯鑫
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: 冯鑫
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: 冯鑫
- Re: question for soc-camera driver
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
- question for soc-camera driver
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Support for write-only controls
- Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] V4L: add "function" sysfs attribute to v4l devices
- Previous by thread: Re: question for soc-camera driver
- Next by thread: Re: question for soc-camera driver
- Index(es):